In the continental United States, solar panels perform best when facing slightly southwest rather than due south. Data from the U.S. Department of Energy reveals that south-facing panels tilted between 15 and 40 degrees capture the most sunlight, maximizing electricity production and reducing utility bills. Even suboptimal roof orientations can still yield significant energy savings.
Experts from the Solar Energy Technologies Office (SETO) and leading installers on EnergySage Marketplace confirm that east- or west-facing systems also generate substantial power. Efficiency depends less on perfect alignment and more on factors like shading, roof size, local electricity rates, and solar policies.
Economically, about two-thirds of single-family and small multifamily homes are suitable for solar installations. Panels can be mounted on south-, west-, or east-facing roofs with tilts ranging from flat to 45 degrees. The primary obstacles are usually shading and limited roof space—not orientation.
Jimmy Johns, co-owner of North Coast Solar in Michigan, notes that heavy shading or structural limitations (like chimneys or skylights) often render installations impractical. Local building codes also require setbacks from roof edges. A system of 8–10 unshaded panels typically pays for itself within a decade.
South-facing panels outperform others because the sun’s trajectory favors southern exposure. Aaron Nitzkin of Citadel Roofing and Solar in California explains that while installation costs are identical across orientations, south-facing panels generate more electricity. Even roofs facing southeast to southwest achieve high efficiency, with minimal losses (under 1% annually for minor deviations).
East- or west-facing systems lose only 10–15% of potential output compared to ideal south-facing setups. Steeper angles or shading may increase losses to 20%, but such systems still offset costs over time. North-facing panels are rarely viable except in unique cases, such as California’s high sunlight and electricity rates, where gentle tilts on northeast/northwest roofs may justify installation.
SETO recommends 15–40 degrees for south-facing panels, aligning with most residential roof slopes (18–34 degrees). Deviations within this range incur negligible losses. East/west orientations perform better at shallower angles, though slight tilts aid self-cleaning. Steeper roofs raise labor costs due to safety measures like scaffolding or lifts.
Flat roofs offer flexibility: panels can be tilted southward at 15 degrees to balance efficiency and wind resistance. Ground-mounted systems allow perfect optimization but are costlier than rooftop installations.
For maximum output, ground-mounted systems can be fine-tuned to local conditions. The optimal azimuth (direction) may vary slightly from due south—for example, 190 degrees in San Diego to account for morning cloud cover. Tilting panels at an angle matching local latitude (adjusted for cloud cover) further boosts efficiency. Tools like NREL’s PV Watts help calculate precise settings.
Under net-billing or time-of-use rates, west-facing panels may save money by aligning with peak demand periods. Steeper winter angles (45–60 degrees) enhance cold-weather performance but reduce summer yields. Properly angled panels also shed snow more easily.
In the continental United States, solar panels perform best when facing slightly southwest rather than due south. Data from the U.S. Department of Energy reveals that south-facing panels tilted between 15 and 40 degrees capture the most sunlight, maximizing electricity production and reducing utility bills. Even suboptimal roof orientations can still yield significant energy savings.
Experts from the Solar Energy Technologies Office (SETO) and leading installers on EnergySage Marketplace confirm that east- or west-facing systems also generate substantial power. Efficiency depends less on perfect alignment and more on factors like shading, roof size, local electricity rates, and solar policies.
Economically, about two-thirds of single-family and small multifamily homes are suitable for solar installations. Panels can be mounted on south-, west-, or east-facing roofs with tilts ranging from flat to 45 degrees. The primary obstacles are usually shading and limited roof space—not orientation.
Jimmy Johns, co-owner of North Coast Solar in Michigan, notes that heavy shading or structural limitations (like chimneys or skylights) often render installations impractical. Local building codes also require setbacks from roof edges. A system of 8–10 unshaded panels typically pays for itself within a decade.
South-facing panels outperform others because the sun’s trajectory favors southern exposure. Aaron Nitzkin of Citadel Roofing and Solar in California explains that while installation costs are identical across orientations, south-facing panels generate more electricity. Even roofs facing southeast to southwest achieve high efficiency, with minimal losses (under 1% annually for minor deviations).
East- or west-facing systems lose only 10–15% of potential output compared to ideal south-facing setups. Steeper angles or shading may increase losses to 20%, but such systems still offset costs over time. North-facing panels are rarely viable except in unique cases, such as California’s high sunlight and electricity rates, where gentle tilts on northeast/northwest roofs may justify installation.
SETO recommends 15–40 degrees for south-facing panels, aligning with most residential roof slopes (18–34 degrees). Deviations within this range incur negligible losses. East/west orientations perform better at shallower angles, though slight tilts aid self-cleaning. Steeper roofs raise labor costs due to safety measures like scaffolding or lifts.
Flat roofs offer flexibility: panels can be tilted southward at 15 degrees to balance efficiency and wind resistance. Ground-mounted systems allow perfect optimization but are costlier than rooftop installations.
For maximum output, ground-mounted systems can be fine-tuned to local conditions. The optimal azimuth (direction) may vary slightly from due south—for example, 190 degrees in San Diego to account for morning cloud cover. Tilting panels at an angle matching local latitude (adjusted for cloud cover) further boosts efficiency. Tools like NREL’s PV Watts help calculate precise settings.
Under net-billing or time-of-use rates, west-facing panels may save money by aligning with peak demand periods. Steeper winter angles (45–60 degrees) enhance cold-weather performance but reduce summer yields. Properly angled panels also shed snow more easily.